| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jason_Florida Newbie
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: May 03 2007 Post subject: Hottest Burn? |
|
|
This could also probably go in the grilling forum, but here goes.
I am planning on grilling steaks this weekend. What heat source burns hottest? I have read that wood burns hotter than charcoal, including lump. Which wood burns hottest?
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mds2 BBQ Super Pro
Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Posts: 1366 Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
|
Posted: May 03 2007 Post subject: Re: Hottest Burn? |
|
|
| Jason_Florida wrote: | This could also probably go in the grilling forum, but here goes.
I am planning on grilling steaks this weekend. What heat source burns hottest? I have read that wood burns hotter than charcoal, including lump. Which wood burns hottest?
Thanks. |
I really dont know what burns hottest, but for grilling i like just plain old kingsford.
For smoking I use lump because it makes less ash, but lump is supposed to burn hotter too. _________________
The Saucy Lads BBQ Team |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason_Florida Newbie
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: May 04 2007 Post subject: Re: Hottest Burn? |
|
|
| mds2 wrote: | | Jason_Florida wrote: | This could also probably go in the grilling forum, but here goes.
I am planning on grilling steaks this weekend. What heat source burns hottest? I have read that wood burns hotter than charcoal, including lump. Which wood burns hottest?
Thanks. |
I really dont know what burns hottest, but for grilling i like just plain old kingsford.
For smoking I use lump because it makes less ash, but lump is supposed to burn hotter too. |
Thanks, but does anyone actually know the answer? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hoochie-Que BBQ Fan

Joined: 27 Sep 2006 Posts: 371 Location: Park City, UT
|
Posted: May 04 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Mesquite will turn out a lot of heat... That would be my "best guess" for a hot burning wood or lump for grilling... Oak wood may not be quite as hot, but would also do nicely and will last a little longer than mesquite (based on my observation)...
Best wishes... _________________ Dr. Mike
Hoochie-Que BBQ Team / KCBS CBJ
"Jesus Loved Barbeque, Too" - Kinky Friedman
Last edited by Hoochie-Que on May 04 2007; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoEzzy BBQ Super All Star

Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 13183 Location: SLC, UT
|
Posted: May 04 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Based on everything I have read on the subject, woods have different calorific values, so the amount you will need to burn to maintain a certain temperature will vary, the hotter woods are the denser ones, Mesquite and Oak being the more common woods available.
If you have access to exotic woods from South America and Afrika some of the densities of the hardwoods are higher than Mesquite and Oak so they will burn hotter.
For personnal use if you want a hot fire get some lump charcoal, if you want to find the better charcoals to use, then take a look at naked whiz charcoal reviwes.
Unless you have a pit designed for a good draft and draw, you are not likely to get the best results with a wood fire, (without years of experience cooking over wood), a charcoal fire on the other hand can give you better results without 1/2 the attention being paid to it that is needed for a wood fire.
When high heat is being sort, for metalurgy smithing work, they don't go out and cut down a tree to burn directly, they take the wood and make charcoal out of it, then they burn the chrcoal, some of the heat of burning wood goes to breaking down the wood, to enable it to burn, with charcoal this has already happened in the charcoal making process, so more of the heat is available for use. _________________ Here's a change Robert.
I still work here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason_Florida Newbie
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: May 04 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| SoEzzy wrote: | Based on everything I have read on the subject, woods have different calorific values, so the amount you will need to burn to maintain a certain temperature will vary, the hotter woods are the denser ones, Mesquite and Oak being the more common woods available.
If you have access to exotic woods from South America and Afrika some of the densities of the hardwoods are higher than Mesquite and Oak so they will burn hotter.
For personnal use if you want a hot fire get some lump charcoal, if you want to find the better charcoals to use, then take a look at naked whiz charcoal reviwes.
Unless you have a pit designed for a good draft and draw, you are not likely to get the best results with a wood fire, (without years of experience cooking over wood), a charcoal fire on the other hand can give you better results without 1/2 the attention being paid to it that is needed for a wood fire.
When high heat is being sort, for metalurgy smithing work, they don't go out and cut down a tree to burn directly, they take the wood and make charcoal out of it, then they burn the chrcoal, some of the heat of burning wood goes to breaking down the wood, to enable it to burn, with charcoal this has already happened in the charcoal making process, so more of the heat is available for use. |
I have a char griller smokin pro. All I am looking for is 10 to 15 minutes of the hottest fire I can get.
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alien BBQ BBQ All Star

Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 5426 Location: Roswell, New Mexico
|
Posted: May 04 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Go with mesquite and open your vents. Warning, I have seen Mesquite warp steel grates when they turned cherry red. It will also burn the stock paint off the outside of you pit. _________________ https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaeloberry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Nutczak BBQ All Star

Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 8558 Location: The Northwoods
|
Posted: May 04 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
according to the woodheat.org website.
this is the list from best to worst for heat potential. many of these woods are unsuitable for cooking though.
Since hickory is near the top of the list, (And my favorite flavor) I sugest that. But burn it to coals first before attempting to cook over it.
here is the link http://www.woodheat.org/firewood/firewood.htm
Rock Elm
Shagbark Hickory
White Oak
Bitternut Hickory
Sugar Maple
Beech
Red Oak
Yellow Birch
Red Elm
White Ash
White Elm
Red Maple
Tamarack
Black Cherry
White Birch
Black Ash
Green Ash
Silver Maple
Manitoba Maple
Large Tooth Aspen
Hemlock
Trembling Aspen
Butternut
Balsam Poplar
White Pine
Basswood
White Cedar
White Spruce
Balsam Fir _________________ Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jason_Florida Newbie
Joined: 12 Jan 2007 Posts: 78
|
Posted: May 04 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you!
| Harry Nutczak wrote: | according to the woodheat.org website.
this is the list from best to worst for heat potential. many of these woods are unsuitable for cooking though.
Since hickory is near the top of the list, (And my favorite flavor) I sugest that. But burn it to coals first before attempting to cook over it.
here is the link http://www.woodheat.org/firewood/firewood.htm
Rock Elm
Shagbark Hickory
White Oak
Bitternut Hickory
Sugar Maple
Beech
Red Oak
Yellow Birch
Red Elm
White Ash
White Elm
Red Maple
Tamarack
Black Cherry
White Birch
Black Ash
Green Ash
Silver Maple
Manitoba Maple
Large Tooth Aspen
Hemlock
Trembling Aspen
Butternut
Balsam Poplar
White Pine
Basswood
White Cedar
White Spruce
Balsam Fir |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|