|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jonfoxx BBQ Fan

Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 120 Location: SOUTHERN New Jersey
|
Posted: Apr 06 2007 Post subject: Royal Oak or Kinsford? |
|
|
I'd like to know the differences that people have found between these 2 products. Personally, I've just started to see (or notice) Royal Oak in my area and I've seen some positive comments about it, but I am curious if there is a difference in performance, taste or some other aspect that makes one better than the other? _________________ JP
"If it ain't fallin' off the bone, it's gnawing off the bone"
Brinkmann Pitmaster Deluxe
Masterbuilt Smokehouse
Weber 22.5 Kettle
BBQ Grillware Propane Grill w/Rotisserie
Sagaform Bucket Grill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Tom BBQ Super Pro

Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 1234 Location: Owensboro, KY
|
Posted: Apr 07 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Are you wondering about the Kingsford "Charwood" or the briquettes?
My team used the Kingsford Briquettes exclusively for many years because of cost and availability. The downside was that we had to preburn before adding into the smokers plus the briquettes produce alot of ash.
We have since switched to using lump charcoal such as the Royal Oak, Nature-glo and Charwood. The Charwood is not as easy to come by as the other brands. We now prefer the lump (pure hardwood) charcoal because of the ease of use and less clean-up afterwards.
To me the difference between any of the mentioned brands is neglegible. I will use any or all of them with out much consideration.
I do prefer to use briquettes when grilling as they tend to burn more evenly for the duration of the cook. Long term ash accumulation is not a concern for a single cooking, plus the pre-burn time allows the cook to marinate on libations while waiting.  _________________ Big Tom
Pigs-R-Us Cooking Team
Owensboro, KY / Corinth, MS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Nutczak BBQ All Star

Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 8558 Location: The Northwoods
|
Posted: Apr 07 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Adolpho and I had a discussion about briquettes VS lump in another thread around here.
If both brands you are refering to are lump, see which one you like better. many people have been displeased with the Royal-oak produt sourced from South America, (the packaged is labeled with the country of origin)
Now for my feeling about briquettes;
charcoal briquettes are only 90% charred wood, (lump is 100%)
the other 10% is real coal dug from the ground, Nitrates for ease of lighting, Glues & binders, fly-ash, & Limestone (so the ash turns white)
The nitrate factor might help develop a stronger smoke ring either deeper or faster, but it is an unintended thing, they add the stuff to get it to light easier, cooking over mineral-based coal really bothers me too. we know mercury pollution is caused by coal burning power plants, but we do not know how much of that is getting on our food when using briquettes. it is probably an amout too small to measure, but any amount of mercury on my food is too much. _________________ Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down!
Last edited by Harry Nutczak on Apr 08 2007; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
roxy BBQ All Star

Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 9331 Location: Wasaga beach, Ontario
|
Posted: Apr 08 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
I think before you make statements that link brickettes to mercury polluted BBQ you should get your facts in order and not start some new urban legend.
Heres a link that explains what is in a brickette.
http://virtualweberbullet.com/charcoal.html#briquette _________________ Chargriller Akorn
WSM
LIAR #100
_________________
Do not rely on a rabbits foot for luck, it did not work out too well for the rabbit... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonfoxx BBQ Fan

Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 120 Location: SOUTHERN New Jersey
|
Posted: Apr 08 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Well, yes, I'm talking real charcoal or charwood... I usually use Cowboy, but it's not always available in my area, but the Kingsford and Royal Oak are pretty much everywhere, so I figured it may be time to move onto something new. I am doing more and more BBQ and I'm going through this stuff fast. _________________ JP
"If it ain't fallin' off the bone, it's gnawing off the bone"
Brinkmann Pitmaster Deluxe
Masterbuilt Smokehouse
Weber 22.5 Kettle
BBQ Grillware Propane Grill w/Rotisserie
Sagaform Bucket Grill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Nutczak BBQ All Star

Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 8558 Location: The Northwoods
|
Posted: Apr 08 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| roxy wrote: | I think before you make statements that link brickettes to mercury polluted BBQ you should get your facts in order and not start some new urban legend.
Heres a link that explains what is in a brickette.
http://virtualweberbullet.com/charcoal.html#briquette |
Maybe a re-reading of my post is needed.
It was stated in a speculative manner.
the opening sentence should have made that very clear Quote;"here is my feelings on briquettes"
We agree that they contain coal, right?
we also know burning of coal produces mercury vapors, right?
So please explain the problem?
EDIT 04-08-07 this is where I have found the ingredients used in most briquettes
http://science.enotes.com/how-products-encyclopedia/charcoal-briquette _________________ Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down!
Last edited by Harry Nutczak on Apr 08 2007; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cyb
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Apr 08 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Quoting from the website(http://virtualweberbullet.com/charcoal.html#briquette)
posted above:
"The only required "other ingredient" in a briquette is a binder, usually a starch of some sort that holds the crushed charcoal". Then why is there so many different ingredients in kingsford, when there are other truly natural charcoal briquette? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
roxy BBQ All Star

Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 9331 Location: Wasaga beach, Ontario
|
Posted: Apr 08 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Carbonizing the coal
"3 Lower grades of coal may also be carbonized for use in charcoal. Crushed coal is first dried and then heated to about 1,100° F (590° C) to drive off the volatile components. After being air-cooled, it is stored until needed."
As alien has stated in many posts about burning a proper wood fire, when it burns correctly the heat of the fire takes care of any harmful elements that are released from the fuel source. The same would apply to the coal as it is also treated before it is added to the mixture to make the brickette.
I did see any mention in the link you provided about brickettes releasing mercury when burnt. You are making an assumption that because a brickette has a coal byproduct in it then it therefore must simply by association create mercury as well when it is burnt.
I still think/feel/believe you need to back up statements like that with facts, and not just a hunch.
But who really cares, if you dont like brickettes then great. Some of the best professonal BBQ'ers out there use them with ecxellent results. _________________ Chargriller Akorn
WSM
LIAR #100
_________________
Do not rely on a rabbits foot for luck, it did not work out too well for the rabbit... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Nutczak BBQ All Star

Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 8558 Location: The Northwoods
|
Posted: Apr 09 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
here is some continued reading that validates how I feel about briquettes.
Both briquettes and lump charcoal create air pollution. Lump charcoal, made from charred wood to add flavor, also contributes to deforestation and adds to the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Charcoal briquettes do have the benefit of being made partly from sawdust (a good use of waste wood), but popular brands may also contain coal dust, starch, sodium nitrate, limestone and borax.
In Canada, charcoal is now a restricted product under the Hazardous Products Act. According to the Canadian Department of Justice, charcoal briquettes in bags that are advertised, imported or sold in Canada must display a label warning of the potential hazards of the product. No such requirements presently exist in the United States.
Consumers can avoid exposure to these potentially harmful additives by sticking with so-called natural charcoal brands. Noram de Mexico’s Sierra Madre 100 percent oak hardwood charcoal contains no coal, oil, limestone, starch, sawdust or petroleum products and, to boot, is certified by the Rainforest Alliance’s SmartWood program as sustainably harvested. The product is available at select Sam’s Clubs across the U.S. Other manufacturers of all natural charcoal include Greenlink and Lazzari, both of which can be found at natural food outlets across North America.
and this is my source;
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3898312/
nothing about mercury noted in the article, But I find it interesting that Canada (your country of residence?)requires warning labels to accompany briquettes and the U.S. does not.
Plain & simple, I do not like briquettes due to the items in them besides charred wood. I quit using them over 20 years ago when I relazied there was a better alternative besides cooking over un-charred wood or processed briquettes. I also will not use Cowboy brand lump because it is recycled wood from miling operations which may or may not contain pesticides, glues, or or different treatments used in lumber production.
Living on BBQ food is bad enough for us, why add to the problems? _________________ Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PalmettoCookers BBQ Fan

Joined: 04 Feb 2006 Posts: 177 Location: Lancaster, SC
|
Posted: Apr 11 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
We used Cowboy until this last cook-off when we found some 57 stone in it. _________________ I'd rather go hunting with Dick Cheney than driving with Ted Kennedy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smokinfunk BBQ Super Fan
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 446 Location: Pensacola, FL
|
Posted: Apr 15 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Don't know if anyone else has seen it this way, but I will never use Cowboy lump again. Used to be the only thing I could find in stores here in Charlotte. Well, I regulary found pieces of lumber scrap in the bag..i.e. picture frames, wall moldings, etc. Once found a piece of plywood! And, it burns waaay too fast.
I can only recommend from what's available now, and my three favorites are: Big Green Egg lump, Kingsford Charwood lump, and my favorite - Original Charcoal Company lump. It's made from South American hardwoods, is very dense, burns much longer than most. The downside - gotta watch it while it's lighting up, because it gives off huge showers of sparks.
Royal Oak lump is also available here, and while it doesn't seem to be of the crap quality that Cowboy is, it's a lighter density, burns up too fast compared to the others I've mentioned.
Kingsford has been making a big push here to eliminate the competition..even going so far that one of their reps went through a Bi-Lo store here, removing the shelf-tags from the competition's products. No shelf-tag means when the store personnel responsible for re-stocking take inventory, if they don't see the tag, they don't know there was ever a product there, so it never gets re-ordered.
Another thing I really love about the Original Charcoal Company lump - when I couldn't find it at my favorite store, I got on the web - found out they're headquartered right here in Charlotte. Called 'em up, left a message. The president of the company - Eric Krause - called me back, told me where to find it, and even told me that if I ever can't find it I can come down to their place to buy it, or that they would even deliver it to me. Very impressed by the customer service. And that has no bearing on their product being my fave - that decision is strictly based on the burn characteristics I've already mentioned. _________________ ============================
WSM 22.5", Digi-Q ATC, Cyber-Q ATC
Brinkmann Cimarron Deluxe offset smoker
Weber One-touch 22.5" grill
Weber One-touch 26" grill
============================
If God hadn't meant for us to eat animals, He would not have made them out of meat! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonfoxx BBQ Fan

Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 120 Location: SOUTHERN New Jersey
|
Posted: Apr 15 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Another thing I really love about the Original Charcoal Company lump - when I couldn't find it at my favorite store, I got on the web - found out they're headquartered right here in Charlotte. Called 'em up, left a message. The president of the company - Eric Krause - called me back, told me where to find it, and even told me that if I ever can't find it I |
Can you get me an email address? I'd like to see if there is a retailer in my area but I can find their website... do they have one?
Very interesting about Cowboy, many similar stories... _________________ JP
"If it ain't fallin' off the bone, it's gnawing off the bone"
Brinkmann Pitmaster Deluxe
Masterbuilt Smokehouse
Weber 22.5 Kettle
BBQ Grillware Propane Grill w/Rotisserie
Sagaform Bucket Grill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smokinfunk BBQ Super Fan
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 446 Location: Pensacola, FL
|
Posted: Apr 16 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
jonfoxx - here you go:
website: www.originalcharcoal.com
email: info@originalcharcoal.com
Note: I googled it since it'd been a while since I had to look up the website - and a review from NakedWhiz came up - but this review is for their "instant light" variety - which is impregnated with a vegetable wax for quick starting. Don't be put off by that - that's NOT the product I use. If you go to their site there are several varieties shown - I use the basic lump shown on the lower left.
Incidentally, just because I was curious, I went back to the NakedWhiz to look up the review for the "standard" lump charcoal. And I have to say my results have not matched their review, both the good and the bad. What I mean is, NW says there is very little sparking while in the chimney, I get TONS of sparking. NW says it produces a lot of ash, I get very little ash. Towards the bottom of their review, a photo after a long burn shows a lot of it left unburned. I'm not sure if they're trying to say that some of it just doesn't burn? Or that it burns for a hell of a long time - this has been my experience. As must always be stated, your mileage may vary. _________________ ============================
WSM 22.5", Digi-Q ATC, Cyber-Q ATC
Brinkmann Cimarron Deluxe offset smoker
Weber One-touch 22.5" grill
Weber One-touch 26" grill
============================
If God hadn't meant for us to eat animals, He would not have made them out of meat! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
markalbob Newbie
Joined: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 26
|
Posted: May 03 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| Harry Nutczak wrote: | | roxy wrote: | I think before you make statements that link brickettes to mercury polluted BBQ you should get your facts in order and not start some new urban legend.
Heres a link that explains what is in a brickette.
http://virtualweberbullet.com/charcoal.html#briquette |
Maybe a re-reading of my post is needed.
It was stated in a speculative manner.
the opening sentence should have made that very clear Quote;"here is my feelings on briquettes"
We agree that they contain coal, right?
we also know burning of coal produces mercury vapors, right?
So please explain the problem?
EDIT 04-08-07 this is where I have found the ingredients used in most briquettes
http://science.enotes.com/how-products-encyclopedia/charcoal-briquette |
Actually, I'll jump in here--coal can and does contain mercury. Mercury is toxic. Mercury is not mercury is not mercury, however. Inorganic mercury (think silver liquid in thermometers) is typically what we have in coal. It is relatively harmless, which is why someof the older folks here probably remember playing with the balls of it from broken thermometers.
Inorganic mercury rises into the atmosphere and comes downin rainfall...it accumulates in lakes and sinks to the sediment. HERE'S where things get fun.....anaerobic bacteria live in the muck and use metals in place of oxygen as electron acceptors to "breathe". This leads to organic mercuries, such as dimethylmercury. These are extremely toxic, and they also enter the body far more readily. This is how we get bioaccumulation of mercury and the reason for fish consumption advisories; if mercury didn't cycle through various redox states, it would be realtively harmless.
'
So, long story short, the trace mercury in charcoal will primarily go in your mouth and out into your toilet within a few days, with you none the worse for wear. If you were to worry about anything from the coal, my concern would be if there were more toxic aryl hydrocarbons present, although if you're eating enough bbq for this to really be a factor, you've already picked up plenty of carcinogens from the "normal" smoke process anyway, making the charcoal issue probably a bit like worrying about if your weekend cigar is going to increase your odds of lung cancer when you smoke 2 packs a day anyway.
That's my science for today |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PantherTailgater Newbie

Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 40 Location: Mooresville, NC
|
Posted: Jun 01 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| Smokinfunk wrote: | Don't know if anyone else has seen it this way, but I will never use Cowboy lump again. Used to be the only thing I could find in stores here in Charlotte. Well, I regulary found pieces of lumber scrap in the bag..i.e. picture frames, wall moldings, etc. Once found a piece of plywood! And, it burns waaay too fast.
I can only recommend from what's available now, and my three favorites are: Big Green Egg lump, Kingsford Charwood lump, and my favorite - Original Charcoal Company lump. It's made from South American hardwoods, is very dense, burns much longer than most. The downside - gotta watch it while it's lighting up, because it gives off huge showers of sparks.
Royal Oak lump is also available here, and while it doesn't seem to be of the crap quality that Cowboy is, it's a lighter density, burns up too fast compared to the others I've mentioned.
Kingsford has been making a big push here to eliminate the competition..even going so far that one of their reps went through a Bi-Lo store here, removing the shelf-tags from the competition's products. No shelf-tag means when the store personnel responsible for re-stocking take inventory, if they don't see the tag, they don't know there was ever a product there, so it never gets re-ordered.
Another thing I really love about the Original Charcoal Company lump - when I couldn't find it at my favorite store, I got on the web - found out they're headquartered right here in Charlotte. Called 'em up, left a message. The president of the company - Eric Krause - called me back, told me where to find it, and even told me that if I ever can't find it I can come down to their place to buy it, or that they would even deliver it to me. Very impressed by the customer service. And that has no bearing on their product being my fave - that decision is strictly based on the burn characteristics I've already mentioned. |
Very interesting! Could you provide some more details of where it's available and where they're located? I've been looking for a more economical and convenient source of lump locally.
I'm in agreement about Cowboy. I bought a couple of bags at Lowes to try and returned one of them because, IMO, it was garbage. I'm currently using Charwood and a occasional bag of Western from Gander Mountain. Both are only available in small bags and therefore rather expensive.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PantherTailgater Newbie

Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 40 Location: Mooresville, NC
|
Posted: Jun 01 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Smokinfunk,
I sent an email and have already received a reply. Very prompt!
Home Depot sells their natural briquette version under the "Rancher" brand name. It's the item that was advertised last week for $2.99 (Reg. $4.99). He says their lump charcoal is available at most Lowes Foods and Ingles supermarkets in 10 lb. bags.
Thanks for supplying the links and email address. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonfoxx BBQ Fan

Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 120 Location: SOUTHERN New Jersey
|
Posted: Jun 04 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
I've been trying the Royal Oak and I'm quite pleased with it. The pieces are much bigger than the Cowboy so it burns longer which saves me money! I haven't come accross the Kingsford yet, but would still try it if I did. _________________ JP
"If it ain't fallin' off the bone, it's gnawing off the bone"
Brinkmann Pitmaster Deluxe
Masterbuilt Smokehouse
Weber 22.5 Kettle
BBQ Grillware Propane Grill w/Rotisserie
Sagaform Bucket Grill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smokinfunk BBQ Super Fan
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 446 Location: Pensacola, FL
|
Posted: Jun 05 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
PantherTailgater - have you tried that natural briquette yet from Original Charcoal Company?
I'm still using up my old stock of lump - but am really curious to know if the briquette product works as well as the lump, especially because it would seem logical that briquettes would give a more predictable yield in terms of amount vs. temperature vs. cooking time. _________________ ============================
WSM 22.5", Digi-Q ATC, Cyber-Q ATC
Brinkmann Cimarron Deluxe offset smoker
Weber One-touch 22.5" grill
Weber One-touch 26" grill
============================
If God hadn't meant for us to eat animals, He would not have made them out of meat! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PantherTailgater Newbie

Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 40 Location: Mooresville, NC
|
Posted: Jun 05 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| Smokinfunk wrote: | PantherTailgater - have you tried that natural briquette yet from Original Charcoal Company?
I'm still using up my old stock of lump - but am really curious to know if the briquette product works as well as the lump, especially because it would seem logical that briquettes would give a more predictable yield in terms of amount vs. temperature vs. cooking time. |
Haven't had a chance yet. Had an illness in the family that required me to be out of town for several days. Hopefully, within the next couple of weeks things will settle down again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PantherTailgater Newbie

Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 40 Location: Mooresville, NC
|
Posted: Jun 14 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| PantherTailgater wrote: | | Smokinfunk wrote: | PantherTailgater - have you tried that natural briquette yet from Original Charcoal Company?
I'm still using up my old stock of lump - but am really curious to know if the briquette product works as well as the lump, especially because it would seem logical that briquettes would give a more predictable yield in terms of amount vs. temperature vs. cooking time. |
Haven't had a chance yet. Had an illness in the family that required me to be out of town for several days. Hopefully, within the next couple of weeks things will settle down again. |
Finally found time to try it out. It is slow starting with a chimney. IMO, it produces less ash than most briquettes but more than most lump charcoal. Nice aroma. I wouldn't hesitate to use it for fast grilling and inderect medium grills, if that makes sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|