|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cyb
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mar 12 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
There are also charcoal product from Lignite too.
Maybe anthracite can be used to cook?
However, why the need to add all the chemicals and coals? why
It seems like a case of whether will you buy a fresh meat or a meat injected with chemicals. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Nutczak BBQ All Star

Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 8558 Location: The Northwoods
|
Posted: Apr 02 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
I've never heard of anyone cooking with it, but it sounds like it doesn't do any harm since people burn it in their homes for heat.
I feel like allsmokenofire. I want facts, not preferences, opinions or heresay.  |
Everything you ever wanted to know about charcoal briquettes (and more)
And my coal as an ingredient statement is verified!
http://www.answers.com/topic/charcoal-briquette
And here is a quote from the linked page
"Raw Materials
Charcoal briquettes are made of two primary ingredients (comprising about 90% of the final product) and several minor ones. One of the primary ingredients, known as char, is basically the traditional charcoal, as described above. It is responsible for the briquette's ability to light easily and to produce the desired wood-smoke flavor. The most desirable raw material for this component is hardwoods such as beech, birch, hard maple, hickory, and oak. Some manufacturers also use softwoods like pine, or other organic materials like fruit pits and nut shells.
The other primary ingredient, used to produce a high-temperature, long-lasting fire, is coal. Various types of coal may be used, ranging from sub-bituminous lignite to anthracite.
Minor ingredients include a binding agent (typically starch made from corn, milo, or wheat), an accelerant (such as nitrate), and an ash-whitening agent (such as lime) to let the backyard barbecuer know when the briquettes are ready to cook over."
So, ask me why I use lump? _________________ Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adolpho BBQ Super Pro

Joined: 03 Aug 2005 Posts: 1067 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Apr 02 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| Harry Nutczak wrote: | | Quote: |
I've never heard of anyone cooking with it, but it sounds like it doesn't do any harm since people burn it in their homes for heat.
I feel like allsmokenofire. I want facts, not preferences, opinions or heresay.  |
Everything you ever wanted to know about charcoal briquettes (and more)
And my coal as an ingredient statement is verified!
http://www.answers.com/topic/charcoal-briquette
And here is a quote from the linked page
"Raw Materials
Charcoal briquettes are made of two primary ingredients (comprising about 90% of the final product) and several minor ones. One of the primary ingredients, known as char, is basically the traditional charcoal, as described above. It is responsible for the briquette's ability to light easily and to produce the desired wood-smoke flavor. The most desirable raw material for this component is hardwoods such as beech, birch, hard maple, hickory, and oak. Some manufacturers also use softwoods like pine, or other organic materials like fruit pits and nut shells.
The other primary ingredient, used to produce a high-temperature, long-lasting fire, is coal. Various types of coal may be used, ranging from sub-bituminous lignite to anthracite.
Minor ingredients include a binding agent (typically starch made from corn, milo, or wheat), an accelerant (such as nitrate), and an ash-whitening agent (such as lime) to let the backyard barbecuer know when the briquettes are ready to cook over."
So, ask me why I use lump? |
So what is sub-bituminous lignite? I've already shown that anthracite is a clean burning coal, but I'm not sure about the sub-bituminous lignite. Is that what's actually bad in briquettes?
Now remember guys, I prefer lump, it's just I sometimes use briquettes because I truly haven't found any harm in them, although sub-bituminous lignite is a new ingredient I'll have to check on.
Thanks for the info! _________________ "Tag line? We don't need no stinkin' tag line!"
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adolpho BBQ Super Pro

Joined: 03 Aug 2005 Posts: 1067 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Apr 02 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Ok here's what I found at this site which defines the different types of coal. I was correct in that anthorcite coal is clean burning. Subituminous and lignite are the lower of 4 categories of coal. So any briquettes containing them might not be of the highest quality of coal. Does it kill you or harm you? It doesn't say, so it's up to you.
Personally, I believe that in this health/environmental concious society, someone would have shut down charcoal briquette companies by now if it was unhealthy for us. But that's just me.
http://www.airbornepollutioncontrol.com/glossary.html
I hope this doesn't turn into an "offset vs. vertical" type of debate and if I'm offending anyone, I don't mean to do it intentionally (I've already received a PM that's kind of a "see...in your face" and I felt bad for possibly having offended him so now he's on the defensive). I see ya'lls points. I'm just wanting to know why no one has shut down charcoal briquette companies if what you claim (and some internet sites as well) is really true? _________________ "Tag line? We don't need no stinkin' tag line!"
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Nutczak BBQ All Star

Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 8558 Location: The Northwoods
|
Posted: Apr 03 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
I find it sad that you took my PM that way, when I post a reply to a topic where someone wants to see the proof that they had asked for,
I always inform the person privately and mention it is posted on the thread.
here is your statement from a previous post in this thread; "Still waiting . Ya'll are saying things without referential documentation and I need to know the truth! "
my basic point is not if cooking over actual coal is safe or not, but the ability to make an informed decision. I do not care to have the mercury vapor associated with the burning of coal transferred onto my food no matter how minuscule it is.
I am betting there is documentation out there stating that daily use for prep of all meals is not recommended. but how many people cook day after day above briquettes? 99.99% of all families maybe see charcoal grilled food less than once a month. we are the exception and minority.
I do not see cigarettes being safe, and those factories are still up & running. and use I use their unsafe product. _________________ Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
adolpho BBQ Super Pro

Joined: 03 Aug 2005 Posts: 1067 Location: Austin, TX
|
Posted: Apr 03 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
| Harry Nutczak wrote: | I find it sad that you took my PM that way, when I post a reply to a topic where someone wants to see the proof that they had asked for,
I always inform the person privately and mention it is posted on the thread.
here is your statement from a previous post in this thread; "Still waiting . Ya'll are saying things without referential documentation and I need to know the truth! "
my basic point is not if cooking over actual coal is safe or not, but the ability to make an informed decision. I do not care to have the mercury vapor associated with the burning of coal transferred onto my food no matter how minuscule it is.
I am betting there is documentation out there stating that daily use for prep of all meals is not recommended. but how many people cook day after day above briquettes? 99.99% of all families maybe see charcoal grilled food less than once a month. we are the exception and minority.
I do not see cigarettes being safe, and those factories are still up & running. and use I use their unsafe product. |
Thanks for the clarification and now I'm sorry for taking the PM wrong. Your cigarrette correlation is a good example. Although people sue them all the time and the governement is trying to shut them down, or make big bicks off of them (high taxes).
You may be right, maybe heavy exposure to briquettes is not healthy. Especially now that I see that it is made with some of the lower quality coals out there. I use it about 30-40% of the time when I use my WSM. I rarely use it in my offsets, but I use it often (about 75%) in my grills. What do you think, too much exposure? I grill less than I smoke, and I use any one of my cookers 2-3 days a week. _________________ "Tag line? We don't need no stinkin' tag line!"
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Nutczak BBQ All Star

Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 8558 Location: The Northwoods
|
Posted: Apr 03 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
How much is Too much exposure??
I didn't find any documentation about that yet.
But the way I see it, (my own personal beliefs, nothing more) is that because every lake in Wisconsin (and most other states) is under a Mercury consumption fish advisory due to coal burning power plants through the years, if the concentrations of mercury in our (Almost Pristine) inland lakes is high enough for the state health dept. to warn everyone to not consume locally caught fish more than twice a week. and this mercury fallout is from rain water, diluted, and spread out. I think it is enough for me to quit briquettes altogether.
This is what I wonder;
How much Mercury vapor is expelled from Briquettes? and how much of that is actually binding to your food so it is ingested?
we would be in the smallish end of "Parts per Million" and maybe a gas chromatography would be the only way to tell.
Maybe I can get a multimillion dollar grant to determine this, and only spend $100K on the research and retire on the rest like most other researchers do.
Maybe there is no measurable amount? possibly less then in the air we breath daily. Fact is I just prefer lump for several reasons, and the use of coal in briquettes is just the frosting on the cake for me to leave tham alone. _________________ Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PalmettoCookers BBQ Fan

Joined: 04 Feb 2006 Posts: 177 Location: Lancaster, SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Nutczak BBQ All Star

Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 8558 Location: The Northwoods
|
Posted: Apr 06 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
here is a site from "mother earth news" about their wood-burning fueled truck.
http://www.motherearthnews.com/Green-Transportation/1974-05-01/How-To-Run-Your-car-On-Wood.aspx
If I had the time & space, I would build one, but my biodiesel plant is taking too much of my time already (I am serious about the biodiesel)
So, nothing yet about health concerns with processed briquettes compared to lump.
The way I see it, the amount of meat we are eating, it is a moot point. _________________ Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|