FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


charcoal v. lump coal
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Smoke Ring Forum Index -> Wood and Charcoal
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cyb



Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Mar 12 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are also charcoal product from Lignite too.

Maybe anthracite can be used to cook?

However, why the need to add all the chemicals and coals? why

It seems like a case of whether will you buy a fresh meat or a meat injected with chemicals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Harry Nutczak
BBQ All Star


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 8558
Location: The Northwoods

PostPosted: Apr 02 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:




I've never heard of anyone cooking with it, but it sounds like it doesn't do any harm since people burn it in their homes for heat.

I feel like allsmokenofire. I want facts, not preferences, opinions or heresay. Very Happy



Everything you ever wanted to know about charcoal briquettes (and more)
And my coal as an ingredient statement is verified!
http://www.answers.com/topic/charcoal-briquette

And here is a quote from the linked page

"Raw Materials

Charcoal briquettes are made of two primary ingredients (comprising about 90% of the final product) and several minor ones. One of the primary ingredients, known as char, is basically the traditional charcoal, as described above. It is responsible for the briquette's ability to light easily and to produce the desired wood-smoke flavor. The most desirable raw material for this component is hardwoods such as beech, birch, hard maple, hickory, and oak. Some manufacturers also use softwoods like pine, or other organic materials like fruit pits and nut shells.

The other primary ingredient, used to produce a high-temperature, long-lasting fire, is coal. Various types of coal may be used, ranging from sub-bituminous lignite to anthracite.

Minor ingredients include a binding agent (typically starch made from corn, milo, or wheat), an accelerant (such as nitrate), and an ash-whitening agent (such as lime) to let the backyard barbecuer know when the briquettes are ready to cook over."

So, ask me why I use lump?
_________________
Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adolpho
BBQ Super Pro


Joined: 03 Aug 2005
Posts: 1067
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Apr 02 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Harry Nutczak wrote:
Quote:




I've never heard of anyone cooking with it, but it sounds like it doesn't do any harm since people burn it in their homes for heat.

I feel like allsmokenofire. I want facts, not preferences, opinions or heresay. Very Happy



Everything you ever wanted to know about charcoal briquettes (and more)
And my coal as an ingredient statement is verified!
http://www.answers.com/topic/charcoal-briquette

And here is a quote from the linked page

"Raw Materials

Charcoal briquettes are made of two primary ingredients (comprising about 90% of the final product) and several minor ones. One of the primary ingredients, known as char, is basically the traditional charcoal, as described above. It is responsible for the briquette's ability to light easily and to produce the desired wood-smoke flavor. The most desirable raw material for this component is hardwoods such as beech, birch, hard maple, hickory, and oak. Some manufacturers also use softwoods like pine, or other organic materials like fruit pits and nut shells.

The other primary ingredient, used to produce a high-temperature, long-lasting fire, is coal. Various types of coal may be used, ranging from sub-bituminous lignite to anthracite.

Minor ingredients include a binding agent (typically starch made from corn, milo, or wheat), an accelerant (such as nitrate), and an ash-whitening agent (such as lime) to let the backyard barbecuer know when the briquettes are ready to cook over."

So, ask me why I use lump?


So what is sub-bituminous lignite? I've already shown that anthracite is a clean burning coal, but I'm not sure about the sub-bituminous lignite. Is that what's actually bad in briquettes?

Now remember guys, I prefer lump, it's just I sometimes use briquettes because I truly haven't found any harm in them, although sub-bituminous lignite is a new ingredient I'll have to check on.

Thanks for the info!
_________________
"Tag line? We don't need no stinkin' tag line!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
adolpho
BBQ Super Pro


Joined: 03 Aug 2005
Posts: 1067
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Apr 02 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok here's what I found at this site which defines the different types of coal. I was correct in that anthorcite coal is clean burning. Subituminous and lignite are the lower of 4 categories of coal. So any briquettes containing them might not be of the highest quality of coal. Does it kill you or harm you? It doesn't say, so it's up to you.
Personally, I believe that in this health/environmental concious society, someone would have shut down charcoal briquette companies by now if it was unhealthy for us. But that's just me.
http://www.airbornepollutioncontrol.com/glossary.html

I hope this doesn't turn into an "offset vs. vertical" type of debate and if I'm offending anyone, I don't mean to do it intentionally (I've already received a PM that's kind of a "see...in your face" and I felt bad for possibly having offended him so now he's on the defensive). I see ya'lls points. I'm just wanting to know why no one has shut down charcoal briquette companies if what you claim (and some internet sites as well) is really true?
_________________
"Tag line? We don't need no stinkin' tag line!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Harry Nutczak
BBQ All Star


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 8558
Location: The Northwoods

PostPosted: Apr 03 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find it sad that you took my PM that way, when I post a reply to a topic where someone wants to see the proof that they had asked for,
I always inform the person privately and mention it is posted on the thread.

here is your statement from a previous post in this thread; "Still waiting . Ya'll are saying things without referential documentation and I need to know the truth! "

my basic point is not if cooking over actual coal is safe or not, but the ability to make an informed decision. I do not care to have the mercury vapor associated with the burning of coal transferred onto my food no matter how minuscule it is.

I am betting there is documentation out there stating that daily use for prep of all meals is not recommended. but how many people cook day after day above briquettes? 99.99% of all families maybe see charcoal grilled food less than once a month. we are the exception and minority.

I do not see cigarettes being safe, and those factories are still up & running. and use I use their unsafe product.
_________________
Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adolpho
BBQ Super Pro


Joined: 03 Aug 2005
Posts: 1067
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Apr 03 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Harry Nutczak wrote:
I find it sad that you took my PM that way, when I post a reply to a topic where someone wants to see the proof that they had asked for,
I always inform the person privately and mention it is posted on the thread.

here is your statement from a previous post in this thread; "Still waiting . Ya'll are saying things without referential documentation and I need to know the truth! "

my basic point is not if cooking over actual coal is safe or not, but the ability to make an informed decision. I do not care to have the mercury vapor associated with the burning of coal transferred onto my food no matter how minuscule it is.

I am betting there is documentation out there stating that daily use for prep of all meals is not recommended. but how many people cook day after day above briquettes? 99.99% of all families maybe see charcoal grilled food less than once a month. we are the exception and minority.

I do not see cigarettes being safe, and those factories are still up & running. and use I use their unsafe product.


Thanks for the clarification and now I'm sorry for taking the PM wrong. Your cigarrette correlation is a good example. Although people sue them all the time and the governement is trying to shut them down, or make big bicks off of them (high taxes).
You may be right, maybe heavy exposure to briquettes is not healthy. Especially now that I see that it is made with some of the lower quality coals out there. I use it about 30-40% of the time when I use my WSM. I rarely use it in my offsets, but I use it often (about 75%) in my grills. What do you think, too much exposure? I grill less than I smoke, and I use any one of my cookers 2-3 days a week.
_________________
"Tag line? We don't need no stinkin' tag line!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Harry Nutczak
BBQ All Star


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 8558
Location: The Northwoods

PostPosted: Apr 03 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

How much is Too much exposure??

I didn't find any documentation about that yet.

But the way I see it, (my own personal beliefs, nothing more) is that because every lake in Wisconsin (and most other states) is under a Mercury consumption fish advisory due to coal burning power plants through the years, if the concentrations of mercury in our (Almost Pristine) inland lakes is high enough for the state health dept. to warn everyone to not consume locally caught fish more than twice a week. and this mercury fallout is from rain water, diluted, and spread out. I think it is enough for me to quit briquettes altogether.


This is what I wonder;
How much Mercury vapor is expelled from Briquettes? and how much of that is actually binding to your food so it is ingested?
we would be in the smallish end of "Parts per Million" and maybe a gas chromatography would be the only way to tell.

Maybe I can get a multimillion dollar grant to determine this, and only spend $100K on the research and retire on the rest like most other researchers do.

Maybe there is no measurable amount? possibly less then in the air we breath daily. Fact is I just prefer lump for several reasons, and the use of coal in briquettes is just the frosting on the cake for me to leave tham alone.
_________________
Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PalmettoCookers
BBQ Fan


Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 177
Location: Lancaster, SC

PostPosted: Apr 06 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Being a project scientist for a large environmental consulting firm you all have peaked my interest in hazards associated with charcoal...plus I had no idea that brown coal was used in charcoal (yuck)...I really couldn't find much on mercury vapor in charcoal, but the paper on lignite combustion shows that the amount is negligible in the grand scheme of things. I would venture to say you get more mercury absorption from swimming in some of those Wisconsin rivers and lakes. I hope some people find these articles interesting as I did. The last one is just plain funny. Good conversation ya'll!


Coal descriptions - http://www.ket.org/Trips/Coal/AGSMM/agsmmtypes.html

Lignite Combustion paper - http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s07.pdf

If you want a laugh read the last paragraph - http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2003/apr/tech/kb_kenya.html

Environmental question and commentary on charcoal - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3898312/

My kinda car! - http://revolvin.blogspot.com/2006/09/wood-charcoal-powered-car.html
_________________
I'd rather go hunting with Dick Cheney than driving with Ted Kennedy!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Harry Nutczak
BBQ All Star


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 8558
Location: The Northwoods

PostPosted: Apr 06 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

here is a site from "mother earth news" about their wood-burning fueled truck.

http://www.motherearthnews.com/Green-Transportation/1974-05-01/How-To-Run-Your-car-On-Wood.aspx

If I had the time & space, I would build one, but my biodiesel plant is taking too much of my time already (I am serious about the biodiesel)

So, nothing yet about health concerns with processed briquettes compared to lump.

The way I see it, the amount of meat we are eating, it is a moot point.
_________________
Just remember that the toes you may step on during your climb to the top will also be attached to the a$$es you'll be forced to kiss on your way back down!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Smoke Ring Forum Index -> Wood and Charcoal All times are GMT + 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group