| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
compound13
Joined: 29 Aug 2008 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: General Question re: importance of appearance |
|
|
Just curious - never entered a competition, probably never will. just watch a lot of food shows, backyard cook on weekends and kick around the forums.
Question: Why the importance on appearance of one's turn in boxes? I could understand certain criteria need to be met, like number of pieces - and i can certainly understand the importance of the appearance of the actual meat (smoke ring, sauce, etc) - but i can't understand why there's any bother put to the type of lettuce used or how the meats are arranged in the box.
Also, it seems to me that if you really wanted to be fair then the appearance should be judged by a team who does NOT eat the meat. If i understand the traditional setup correctly (and I probably don't) the box is passed around for inspection before the judges take their sample. As I'm sure everyone has heard before "you eat with all your senses" so it would follow that it's POSSIBLE that poor appearance could adversely effect taste grades (or vice versa).
Wouldn't a more fair way of doing it involve appearance judges separate from taste ones?
Again, i'm just wondering. I have nothing against appearance or cleanliness in general  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DawgPhan BBQ Super Pro
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 3444
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
hmmm......I would say that you are probably misinformed about some of the finer points of competition bbq, specifically the garnish aspects of KCBS.
Just know that the apperance score is the score of the meat and not the garnish and that if garnish is not your thing then there are many fine blind box/no garnish sanctioning bodies and you may find that they suit you better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
compound13
Joined: 29 Aug 2008 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know about misinformed, but i'm certainly non-informed I guess that's what I'm asking! I understand according to the KCBS rules that only certain types of garnish can be used and apparently no garnish is technically required.
I guess my two basic questions are this: 1) is it possible that a judge's taste and tenderness scores could be influenced by their initial appearance score?
and 2) when judging appearance, would 8 pieces of "meat" identical in every way possible, get the same appearance score if one group were thrown in a box sans garnish and another were meticulously placed on a warm and inviting bed of curly parsley?
Again, i'm not asking because i plan on entering any competition - i'm just wondering how appearance is scored and why appearance would be scored before taste if in fact it could influence the taste scores |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
allsmokenofire BBQ All Star

Joined: 26 Apr 2005 Posts: 5051 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
If appearance didn't affect taste, you wouldn't see an emphasis placed on plating at any high-end restaurant. The saying goes, you eat with your eyes first. Would you rather your Big Mac look like the one in the picture on the menu board, or look like the one slung in the box, haphazardly, like it normally is? Chances are, both Big Macs would taste the same, but I'd bet you'd enjoy the one that looks like the picture more than the one slung in the box. _________________ Mike
Team Enoserv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
compound13
Joined: 29 Aug 2008 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
mmmm...big mac. the big mac is kind of like that move in the karate kid "if do right, no can defense". Unfortunately it's almost never done right and never looks like that one up on the board.
but to your point, i agree - I think visual perception does effect taste and experience. that's why it would make it harder on a judge to maintain an impartial opinion when judging the taste aspects of a dish immediately after judging the aesthetic aspects.
Furthermore, taste and texture are supposed to account for a higher percentage of ones score yet both can be influenced by the less significant factor of appearance. IMO this puts a greater emphasis on appearance than initially intended by the original scoring system.
i just thought it was a little weird that a system designed to be as fair as possible (double blind boxes and all that jazz) may not be as fair as it possibly could be - particularly since it would seem relatively easy to add non-eating appearance judges (give these jobs to the ones with the highest BP!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DawgPhan BBQ Super Pro
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 3444
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
you would be better off not worrying about it. You dont understand it, you have a preconceived notion of what it means and you are basing in on nothing. I doubt that the appearance score affects the taste and tenderness score as much as you think it does.
But to answer your questions..
1. sure its possible but to a meaningful degree, no.
2. 2 identical boxes are going to score differently on different days and with different judges. Hell you could probably give the same judge the same box 2 days in a row and get 2 different scores.
But again, you have no idea what you are talking about and came, not with questions, but opinions...opinion based on nothing but your speculation about how something works. I would suggest you just move along to some other section of the message board that is more suitable to your current bbq acumen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cory Hess BBQ Fan

Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 240 Location: Twin Lakes, WI
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
The old "If you don't know, don't ask." theory.
compound13, you have stumbled onto one of the great BBQ mysteries. Few have dared ask such questions and lived to tell about it.
I think that what DawgPhan is trying to say is that in his opinion the visuals won't affect the judging of the taste/texture as much as you seem to think it will, and that this possibility is far outweighed by other variables during judgment so as to make it a moot point.
Here's a brain twister, maybe you're right and the visual judging does affect the tasting. Maybe, the people that made the scoring system were aware of this affect. Maybe they wanted to make the visual aspect 50% of the score, but knowing that it would automatically affect the tasting portion they had to give the tasting more weight to balance this out. Maybe I'm full of it, who knows.
DawgPhan, maybe you can be more friendly. If you don't find it possible, maybe you can simply ignore the questions that offend you so and let others answer them. Maybe there are others on this site who have been considering competing because they hear about what a friendly environment surrounds the sport. Maybe they'll read your posts and think "Great, another elitist club. I'll just join another fantasy football league." Either way, this is a section for competition BBQ and I don't think you should be telling people with questions about competition BBQ to stay out of this section.
Maybe I'm going to climb off of my soap box now.  _________________ UDS
"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DawgPhan BBQ Super Pro
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 3444
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| You are new, so you might not know, but that was friendly. That is as friendly a response as you can possibly give someone who starts in with the "I have no idea what I am talking about, but I sure do have an opinion". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cory Hess BBQ Fan

Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 240 Location: Twin Lakes, WI
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
I am new, and I didn't mean to step on toes. Sometimes, when I read what somebody writes I take it the wrong way. Probably what happened here. Seeing as how I'm new I think I deserve a second shot at a reply. Here goes:
compound13, the KCBS has obviously been around for awhile as it's events are highly regarded amongst those in the know. It was most likely put together by people that had a pretty good idea of what they were doing, and the few wrinkles that were in the system have probably been ironed out long ago. That being said, maybe if you attended an event as an observer, even if you don't plan on ever competing, your fears could be put to rest by seeing the process firsthand. Worst case scenario, you mingle with people that you share a past time with and pick up some tips.
How was that? _________________ UDS
"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
INmitch BBQ Fan
Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 295
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
Compound13 hang around & ask all the questions ya want. It's not like there's been too much going on here with tournament season in full swing. Not everyone here will be so negative to your posts. Giggles I appreciate your tact.  _________________ I'm simple & I can prove it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jarhead BBQ All Star

Joined: 11 Oct 2009 Posts: 7355 Location: Marionville, Home of the White Squirrels, Missouri
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
KCBS Rules state:
| Quote: | The weighting factors for the point system are as follows:
Appearance ‐ 0.5714, Taste ‐ 2.2858, Tenderness ‐ 1.1428. |
All factors are important in your total score, but how they weigh is as stated above.
Appearance has nothing to do with your score for taste or tenderness. However it could be the difference between a call or not. _________________ Gunny 3073/4044/8411
Jarhead's World Blog
KCBS CBJ & HMFIC Debbie's Q Shack |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DawgPhan BBQ Super Pro
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 3444
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| Giggles wrote: | I am new, and I didn't mean to step on toes. Sometimes, when I read what somebody writes I take it the wrong way. Probably what happened here. Seeing as how I'm new I think I deserve a second shot at a reply. Here goes:
compound13, the KCBS has obviously been around for awhile as it's events are highly regarded amongst those in the know. It was most likely put together by people that had a pretty good idea of what they were doing, and the few wrinkles that were in the system have probably been ironed out long ago. That being said, maybe if you attended an event as an observer, even if you don't plan on ever competing, your fears could be put to rest by seeing the process firsthand. Worst case scenario, you mingle with people that you share a past time with and pick up some tips.
How was that? |
great! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
compound13
Joined: 29 Aug 2008 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
wow - someone had a bad night!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6cxNR9ML8k
Again, please excuse my curiousity - it was not intended to offend. Clearly this is a touchy subject - and i didn't realize the heightened sensitivity of its nature.
Guess I'll just run back to my fantasy football league now! ... where I will not be drafting Matthew Stafford  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DawgPhan BBQ Super Pro
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 3444
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| compound13 wrote: | wow - someone had a bad night!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6cxNR9ML8k
Again, please excuse my curiousity - it was not intended to offend. Clearly this is a touchy subject - and i didn't realize the heightened sensitivity of its nature.
Guess I'll just run back to my fantasy football league now! ... where I will not be drafting Matthew Stafford  |
no it was just a lame attempt at trolling this section of the message board. You weren't curious because nothing you posted read that way...
The sensitivity doesn't come from the question, but rather the competition section has a constant stream of the uninitiated who seem to think that they have a better understanding of competitions that the people who have been organizing, competing, judging, and attending BBQ contests across the country for years. You admittedly have no interest in competing, so why the appearance weighting or influence is of interest to you beyond me. It would seem that you are simply looking to stir the pot. The Stafford and fantasy football jabs, speak to that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
compound13
Joined: 29 Aug 2008 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
holy crap - you have to be kidding me.
first off - the fantasy football was a joke b/c a previous poster referenced it first. Stafford is a joke too b/c you're clearly a Georgia football fan. the SGT Houlka reference is clearly not a joke. Seriously dude - lighten up.
the question is a legitimate one - and one that i find to be intriguing to me. A question that i think is open for discussion. I'm not stirring any pot, and if you think i am then it's only because you brought a pot to the conversation. I'm asking a theoretical question - i can't for the life of me understand how that's offensive to you. If you don't want to discuss it, then don't. Leave the thread, never click on it again. I'm totally aware of the fact that you have no interest in discussing the point, so don't.
I'm not criticizing the system, the rules, or BBQ competitions in general. I'm asking for some insight into the system. Sorry if I just wanted to know for the sake of knowing. I didn't think that I had to move down south and enter a competition for the sole purpose of asking a question. (to an earlier poster, i would LOVE to attend some competitions - partly for the sake of eating but also to take in the atmosphere of what I perceive to be a nod towards a different way of life. Unfortunately, doesn't seem to be many in my neck of the woods in the NE, and there always seems to be a family conflict when they do happen by).
Anyways, I get that you are some awesome BBQ star and you probably came out of your mother's womb with all the the BBQ knowledge you ever needed. I get that you probably never asked a single person in your entire life about BBQ and certainly not about the importance of BBQ appearance. I get that you get really offended when someone who doesn't share your vast knowledge of teh BBQ competition has the balls to actually inquire about it.
I don't get why you choose to act the way you do. You make a choice to be offensive at worst and ornary at best. In my opinion your attitude offends the very nature of "BBQ". There's a lot more to life than getting called. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
compound13
Joined: 29 Aug 2008 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Jun 24 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| oh, and by the way - do you really think people are trolling BBQ message boards trying to offend you???? get over yourself |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jarhead BBQ All Star

Joined: 11 Oct 2009 Posts: 7355 Location: Marionville, Home of the White Squirrels, Missouri
|
Posted: Jun 25 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| compound13 wrote: | | There's a lot more to life than getting called. |
When you invest 2 - 3 days and a hell of a lot of money into a competition, it is very nice to have something to show for it. Either a ribbon, a plaque or a check. If not, at least you have had the opportunity to meet new friends and touch base with the old ones. That sir, is the "Love of BBQ".
Life is a competition in every way, I don't go to work to be DAL with no chance of promotion or pay raise and I do not enter comps to be DAL either.
My standards must be higher than yours, as I prefer not to be a loser. _________________ Gunny 3073/4044/8411
Jarhead's World Blog
KCBS CBJ & HMFIC Debbie's Q Shack |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NaughtyNurse BBQ Super Pro

Joined: 18 Sep 2008 Posts: 1015 Location: Winfield, KS
|
Posted: Jun 25 2010 Post subject: Re: General Question re: importance of appearance |
|
|
| compound13 wrote: |
Question: Why the importance on appearance of one's turn in boxes? I could understand certain criteria need to be met, like number of pieces - and i can certainly understand the importance of the appearance of the actual meat (smoke ring, sauce, etc) - but i can't understand why there's any bother put to the type of lettuce used or how the meats are arranged in the box.
Also, it seems to me that if you really wanted to be fair then the appearance should be judged by a team who does NOT eat the meat. If i understand the traditional setup correctly (and I probably don't) the box is passed around for inspection before the judges take their sample. As I'm sure everyone has heard before "you eat with all your senses" so it would follow that it's POSSIBLE that poor appearance could adversely effect taste grades (or vice versa).
Wouldn't a more fair way of doing it involve appearance judges separate from taste ones? |
Since I seem to have a knack for killing threads with my opinion I'll try this one I think the answer to your first question is 'expectation'. Did you happen to watch episode 1 of the Pitmasters? Perfect example, Paul plates his ribs by throwing 6 in a box and put a couple pieces of parsley on top, where the others spent time to make theirs look good. Now if Paul's box and Johnny's box were placed in front of you, which one would you want to eat first? Bet it wouldn't be Pauls. As a cook I believe the appearance is going to affect my taste score, as a judge I try to judge each part on its own merit. And just FYI, smoke rings can be artificially created so judges should not consider that as part of the appearance, just as the garnish is optional and therefore not to be judged.
Is the system perfect? No, but as long as humans are involved it's the best we have.
And to the other posters, I am assuming by compound's grammar that he is just curious and not the return of the creeper  _________________ Naughty Nurses BBQ
"No one injects BUTTS like we do"
www.facebook.com/nnbbq www.naughtynursesbbq.com
KCBS CBJ
FEC-100, FE/PG1000, 22" WSM, Good-One Rodeo, Big Steel Keg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
compound13
Joined: 29 Aug 2008 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Jun 25 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | My standards must be higher than yours, as I prefer not to be a loser. |
am i in the twilight zone or something?
you talk about meeting new friends and the love of BBQ in one sentence (which was my point exactly about bbq/life in general) then call me a loser in the next.
I give up.
To the others, no - i'm not "the creeper" and i don't know who that is. I could certainly understand that it would be annoying if someone was trying to come into "your house" and stir up a bunch of nonsense just for the sake of doing so. Again, I can assure you that is/was not my intention and I thank you for your patience and your insight.
The diverse answers have in a way verified what i suspected - as some think appearance has an effect (on other scores), some think it has a negligble effect and some (when judging) try to fight against their human nature to negate any effect. I'm starting to think Giggles is right - maybe this is exactly what the judges wanted to achieve in the first place - to embrace the human element by accepting its potential flaws and inconsistancies, rather than attempt to cut it out (good thing i never asked about blindfold taste testing!)  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NaughtyNurse BBQ Super Pro

Joined: 18 Sep 2008 Posts: 1015 Location: Winfield, KS
|
Posted: Jun 25 2010 Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, they did try blind-folded judging but it didn't work out. Judges kept getting samples mixed up, writing scores in the wrong place on the card, and one judge even had to go to the hospital to have a rib bone removed from his nose after missing his mouth  _________________ Naughty Nurses BBQ
"No one injects BUTTS like we do"
www.facebook.com/nnbbq www.naughtynursesbbq.com
KCBS CBJ
FEC-100, FE/PG1000, 22" WSM, Good-One Rodeo, Big Steel Keg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|